×
Member resources Member portal

Search site

  • About us
    • Purpose and history
      • About IPTA
      • History of IPTA
    • Membership
      • Membership benefits
      • Become a member
      • Pay your fees and charges
    • IPTA Council
      • IPTA Council members
      • Committees and representatives
    • Contact IPTA
  • Learn about IP
    • About IP rights
      • Intellectual Property
      • Patents
      • Trade Marks
      • Plant Breeder’s Rights
      • Designs
    • Role of an attorney
      • The role of patent & trade marks attorneys
      • Right of privilege
    • Commercialising your IP
  • Find an attorney
    • How to choose an attorney
    • Why choose an IPTA attorney
    • Get a free consultation
    • Search for an attorney
  • News and events
    • Latest IP news
    • Event Calendar
    • Events
    • IPTA Bulletin
    • Media
      • IPTA Media Centre
      • Public IPTA submissions
  • Careers in IP
    • Becoming an attorney
      • Requirements for registering as a patent or trade marks attorney
      • Prescribed subject groups
    • Jobs Board
Search
Already a member?
Member sign in
Explore IPTA
Menu
Home / News / Ono – be careful with patent term extensions

Ono – be careful with patent term extensions

12 February 2021

A patent term extension (PTE) provides a valuable mechanism for an Australian patent holder to extend the term of a pharmaceutical patent beyond the standard 20-year term. The PTE provisions are designed to compensate a patentee for the relatively long time required to develop, test and obtain regulatory approval to commercialise a new drug.

 

PTE Requirements

An application for a PTE can be made when (i) the patent relates to a pharmaceutical substance or a pharmaceutical substance when produced by recombinant DNA technology, (ii) the substance is included on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) before the 20-year term of the patent expires, and (iii) at least five years have elapsed between the effective filing date of the patent application and the first inclusion of the pharmaceutical on the ARTG.

An application for a PTE must be lodged within six months from the later of (i) the date on which the patent was granted or (ii) the date of first regulatory approval of a product containing or consisting of a pharmaceutical substance covered by a claim of the patent.

 

Background

In the recent case of Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al. [2020] APO 43, the Australian Patent Office had to determine the date of first regulatory approval of a product containing or consisting of a pharmaceutical substance covered by the claims of the patent.

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and E. R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. are the owners of Australian Patent No. 2011203119 (the Ono patent) which covers monoclonal antibodies that bind to PD-1. Important cancer immunotherapy drugs Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA – a Merck Sharpe and Dohme product) and the Nivolumab (OPDIVO – an Ono Pharmaceutical product) are covered by the Ono patent.

ARTG approvals for KEYTRUDA and OPDIVO were obtained in Australia on 16 April 2015 and 11 January 2016, respectively. The patentee filed two separate applications for PTE, the first based on the KEYTRUDA regulatory approval date and the second based on the OPDIVO regulatory approval date. The latter PTE would provide a slightly longer extension term, and therefore the patentee asked for this PTE request to be considered first. The KEYTRUDA-based PTE request would also require the granting of an extension of time, as the PTE request was filed more than six months after the KEYTRUDA regulatory approval date.

 

Decision

The OPDIVO-based PTE request was considered by a Delegate of the Commissioner who held that the KEYTRUDA pharmaceutical substance fell within the scope of the claims of the Ono patent, and the PTE request should have been filed within six months from the date of first inclusion of KEYTRUDA on the ARTG. The patentee requested a hearing in relation to this decision and submitted at the hearing that the purpose of the extension of term provisions was to restore the time lost to patentees prior to gaining marketing approval and that a construction of the PTE provisions that would render the OPDIVO-based PTE request invalid would be manifestly absurd or unreasonable. The Delegate disagreed with the patentee and held that the pharmaceutical substance to be considered with a PTE request does not have to belong to the patentee and that a PTE request must be based on the earliest of the approval dates that apply to the patent, irrespective of who obtained the approval. Therefore, the Delegate decided that the KEYTRUDA regulatory approval date was the earliest first regulatory approval date and the OPDIVO-based PTE request was refused.

 

Important considerations

It is important for patentees to be aware of all pharmaceutical substances that fall within the scope of the claims of their patent and their respective regulatory approval dates because a PTE request will need to be filed within six months of the earliest regulatory approval date, irrespective of whether that regulatory approval was obtained by the patentee themselves or by a third party.

It is also important for patentees to carefully consider the scope of their granted patent claims because broad claims are more likely to include pharmaceutical substances that may have regulatory approval obtained by a third party.

In summary: A patent term extension (PTE) must be requested within six months of the earliest regulatory approval date of a pharmaceutical substance covered by the claims of the patent, even when the earliest regulatory approval was not obtained by the patentee. Patentees will need to be aware of all pharmaceutical substances that fall within the scope of the claims of their patent and their respective regulatory approval dates. They should carefully consider the scope of their granted patent claims to ensure they do not cover pharmaceutical substances that may have regulatory approval obtained by a third party.

Link to article 

Share this page

We use cookies

Our website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.

Google analytics

These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our website. We use the information to compile reports and to help us improve our website. The cookies collect information in an anonymous form, including the number of visitors to our website, where visitors have come to the website from and the pages they visited.

Level 33, 477 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia

P +61 3 9639 4377

  • About us
    • Purpose and history
      • About IPTA
      • History of IPTA
    • Membership
      • Membership benefits
      • Become a member
      • Pay your fees and charges
    • IPTA Council
      • IPTA Council members
      • Committees and representatives
    • Contact IPTA
  • Learn about IP
    • About IP rights
      • Intellectual Property
      • Patents
      • Trade Marks
      • Plant Breeder’s Rights
      • Designs
    • Role of an attorney
      • The role of patent & trade marks attorneys
      • Right of privilege
    • Commercialising your IP
  • Find an attorney
    • How to choose an attorney
    • Why choose an IPTA attorney
    • Get a free consultation
    • Search for an attorney
  • News and events
    • Latest IP news
    • Event Calendar
    • Events
    • IPTA Bulletin
    • Media
      • IPTA Media Centre
      • Public IPTA submissions
  • Careers in IP
    • Becoming an attorney
      • Requirements for registering as a patent or trade marks attorney
      • Prescribed subject groups
    • Jobs Board

For Attorneys

  • About IPTA
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Become a member
  • Media
  • Careers in IP

For the Community

  • About IP rights
  • Intellectual Property
  • Why choose an IPTA attorney
  • How to choose an attorney
  • Get a free consultation
  • Find an attorney

For the media & policy makers

  • About IPTA
  • Intellectual Property

Copyright 2026 IPTA | All Rights Reserved.

  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CONTACT IPTA
Site by